It’s a great day when the antis show how painfully aware they are of their shortcomings, see Beyond bunnies “Say some killer points and then shut up".

How the tables have turned!  Apparently defending animal research is the ‘easy job’ (since when?!), and

‘This thing is deliberately being turned into a PR war by a pro-vivisectionist lobby that see themselves as on the defensive for too long. That’s dangerous: clever people + emotional blackmail + lots of money to spend on “education” (as Aziz said) = trouble for the Manns & Broughtons of this world.’
[Comment 3]

Ha ha!  We’re turning this into a PR war?!  My irony-meter just blew.

The blog itself had some spectacular sour grapes: because they perceive ‘our’ side as coming off better in the media, it must be because ‘we’ have cheated in some way (and not because irrational people who are blinded by their sense of right are illogical and scary):

‘Intensive media coaching from the slick and over-funded RDS has no doubt helped here’

Tut tut, stop sucking that lemon - as Iain Simpson pointed out (Comment 6) that RDS has never provided media training for him or Tipu as alleged in the blog.  It’s nice that Beyond bunnies is so impressed by ‘our’ efforts that s/he thinks we’re slick, but since when has RDS been over-funded?  NAVS and BUAV each have five times the level of funding of RDS, and we’ve spent the best-part of the last 100 years fighting our corner alone.