US alert over animal rights extremism

An article in the July issue of BBC Focus highlights dangerous jobs in science. It’s all about people risking their lives to advance our knowledge and understanding of the world today - covering everything from volcanologists and hurricane hunters, to deadly snake venom collectors. You may think perhaps a lab worker dealing with deadly cultures may be included in the roll call of dangerous jobs. However, it is not the working side of being a researcher that gives Michael Conn his place in the article.

Conn is an Associate Director of the Oregon National Primate Research Centre, and has been targeted by the increasingly powerful animal rights extremist movement in the US. It is the actions of this group that prompted him to draw on his experiences and write a new book with James Parker, called The Animal Research War. It looks at the arguments used by animal activists, and explains the truth behind animal research. 

The book has received reviews both rewarding the openness Conn has shown, and critising the book for not going far enough in explaining animal research (Deborah Blum, New Scientist; Andrew Read, Nature). In any case, it is an initiation into the world animal extremists live in - an acknowledgement of the extent to which they are willing to go in order to get their message across - to stop all research with animals. 

Blogger the Scientific Activist has written about The Animal Research War, and makes an interesting point that this book highlights the web of support different organisations have created – and people who support organisations with links to extremists should be aware of exactly where their support goes; you can read the blog entry here.

The review in New Scientist sums up what needs to be done in the USA, saying the book ‘asks the research community and its supporters to fight back against a well-honed opposition’. The US science community is under threat from the actions of the extremists. With the UK having better laws we have seen their activity die down, and extremists prosecuted. More information on the decline in the UK can be seen in a recent item on the RDS website. For the most part, scientists are able to be proud and loud about the work they do - this needs to be translated across the pond to prevent people being intimidated into abandoning potentially life saving research.

Comments

    Page 1 of 1 pages of comments • Follow through:
  1. In this weeks issue of Science Magazine, published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, there’s an item which indicates that the Americans may be beginning to learn from the UK experience. Unfortunately you need to be registered to see it.

    It’s a short piece in the Newsmakers section on Tom Holder, a founding member of Pro-Test in the UK, who recently established a new US campaign called Speaking of Research.  I found the following comments particularly encouraging

    ‘When a lot of people stand up together, the attacks go right down,’ says Holder, who founded the nonprofit group Speaking of Research in March.

    It’s a message US audiences need to hear, says the recent University of Oxford philosophy graduate, citing the presence of an armed police officer outside the hall at one recent university speech he gave. ‘It really sent the wrong message,’ Holder says. ‘I’m out there saying you’re not going to get attacked for speaking up about this.’

    As a participant in Pro-Test’s demonstrations I have to agree with Tom, and I hope that scientists and supporters of science in the USA get the message.

    Posted by Visigoth / July 11, 2008 | Friday | 04:32 PM |
  2. Page 1 of 1 pages of comments • Follow through:

Only registered users can comment

Please use the login form in the left column.

<< Back to main