If at first you don't succeed ... slice the salami a bit thinner

The Guardian today published a short news item Many animal tests are badly flawed, say scientists. This news item was based on a paper in this week’s British Medical Journal, and the subject of a BMJ press release.

I thought it looked very familiar. I checked, and it seems this is research published as a report on the University of Birmingham website six months ago. I thought its conclusions were a bit dodgy then and I blogged it here.

This is just the same research redrafted for the BMJ. If at first you don’t succeed in getting publicity, just redraft your paper and get it published in a different place. If you’re lucky you might then get the national newspapers interested in a story based on an exaggeration that is six months old anyway.

Rather than bury this as a comment on an old blog entry I thought I’d follow their example and do a new one to put it right at the top.

Comments

    Page 1 of 1 pages of comments • Follow through:
  1. ... and the scienctific community contunues to learn and be self-critical, studying stroke remains a challenge and work continues to address this:

    Biochem Soc Trans. 2006 Dec;34(Pt 6):1318-22.
    Translational vehicles for neuroprotection. Papadakis M, Buchan AM.
    Acute Stroke Programme, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
    This review will analyse particular criteria in the analysis of stroke diagnosis and treatment, which are pivotal for the successful translation of experimental data from the laboratory to humans.

    Posted by Haruspica / January 22, 2007 | Monday | 11:39 AM |
  2. Page 1 of 1 pages of comments • Follow through:

Only registered users can comment

Please use the login form in the left column.

<< Back to main