Green behind the ears

The Independent’s Green Goddess columnist Julia Stevenson’s green hue seems to be that of naivete and gullibility. Her latest column says ‘We don’t need to capture wild primates and destroy them in labs’. She’s right: we don’t need to and we don’t do it, because almost without exception primates are bred especially for research. And someone should tell Julia and her antivivisection spinmeisters that apes haven’t been used in the UK research for well over 20 years, or in any EU country since 2000.

That’s not all. Inspired by groups like Animal Defenders International (this is what the National Anti Vivisection Society prefers to call itself, unsurprisingly), she took part in a monkey-in-cage photocall last week. Apparently there were 20 photographers there. Strange we haven’t seen the pictures yet. Maybe they were all undercover police.

Singer Maria Daines was also there, whose dreadful dirge ‘Monkey in a Cage’ (earnest, but naff, lyrics here) is apparently topping indie and rock charts. I don’t follow the charts, but everyone tells me it’s nowhere near the top 20, let alone number one.

Julia is woefully out-of-date on the progress of the antivivisectionists’ Written Declaration in the European Parliament on primate research. She thinks it still has to get 100 more signatures ‘for a ban on primate testing’. Wrong on both counts. It has already received the requisite number of signatures (on the day before Julia’s piece was published) to move to the next stage, which I think means:

• EU President notifies EU Parliament which publishes declaration and names of signatories in the minutes of the relevant sitting. This ‘closes’ the procedure.
• Declaration is forwarded to institutions named together with names of the signatories.
• The EU Commission will probably provide a written answer to the declaration.

This hardly warrants the jubilation in the ADI camp and it certainly falls far short of ‘the end of primate research in Europe’. Jan Creamer, ADI chief executive, trumpeted:

‘This is history in the making and will end the suffering of some 10,000 primates a year in European labs and the adoption of more reliable modern alternatives.’

There is a deadly serious point here. Ending primate research would hamper research into HIV/AIDS, Parkinson’s disease, and malaria – to name but three serious medical problems in which primate studies are indispensible. While we would all wish to see non-animal alternatives ‘adopted’, it’s simply not possible until we have the alternatives, which is a long way off.

So it’s just as well that a Europe-wide ban cannot happen simply on the say so of naïve MEPs swayed by antivivisection songs and stunts.

Comments

    Page 1 of 1 pages of comments • Follow through:
  1. It seems I was misinformed (but not as badly misinformed as the ‘Green Goddess’, or indeed the Daily Mirror on Saturday, who swallowed the ADI line).

    To set the record straight, it looks a though apes (in this case chimpanzees) were last used in EU research in 2004.

    Another example of the damage that crazy red tape can do to research and our future health is in the papers today. The Daily Mail sums it up:

    In early experiments on mice, the London researchers, working with experts at the California Institute of Technology, introduced dummy or test genes into mice.

    They then moved on to pigs and have altered the sperm of six pigs by inserting a test gene into their testicles.

    But EU regulations mean that the researchers have so far been refused permission to breed from the pigs.

    This, combined with a 13-month delay for Home Office approval to inject the gene into the pigs, means further research may be carried out in the US.

    This is not some mad Frankenstein project (you can be sure the Daily Mail would point it out if it was!) but Robert Winston trying to develop genetically modified pig organs for transplant (Winston backs breeding ‘designer pigs with hearts for humans’). Cue picture of cuddly Lord Winston cuddling baby.

    Posted by Zebedee / September 11, 2007 | Tuesday | 03:14 PM |
  2. Zebedee, must you cite the Daily Mail?  For those with more “progressive” tastes here’s the Guardian’s take on the story http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/sep/10/organs.

    It’s a real issue though, while my own limited experience of the Home Office approval process was positive some colleagues have expressed frustration at unexplained delays in processing their applications. Perhaps the Home Office needs to hire more inspectors so that they can process the applications more quickly and avoid backlogs building up without diminishing the thoroughness of their analysis of a projects scientific merits and animal welfare implications.

    Posted by Visigoth / September 12, 2007 | Wednesday | 11:34 AM |
  3. Page 1 of 1 pages of comments • Follow through:

Only registered users can comment

Please use the login form in the left column.

<< Back to main